🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a well-known figure recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of votes added later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However the winner added half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Plus he boosted his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president last year backed Zohran this year. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he does so then none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these Republicans on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the property owners and residents supported Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key figures from the left come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.